Wednesday, February 11, 2026

The Burroughs Portable ribbon spools; the 7/16" keyhole type

The common Burroughs Portable adding listing machine that was introduced in 1925 uses a narrow, 7/16" ribbon. The spools are also narrow, small-diameter and have a Burroughs-specific keyhole driving hole/slot.

This spool was not created for the Portable line, but it was a carry-over from the Class 3 machines. The Burroughs Class 3 machines in turn are originally the Pike adding machines made by the Pike Adding Machine Company of 1904. 


The Pike company started around 1904, their machine was perhaps first sold commercially around 1906. These Pike full-keyboard adding-listing machines were probably selling well enough for Burroughs to notice. By 1909 Burroughs had taken control of Pike; in industry press it is reported late 1909 that the sales of the Pike company are now controlled by Burroughs.

In January 1910 a new model, the Pike Visible is announced. The 7/16" ribbon and keyhole spool may have its origins in this ~1909 Visible design-effort, but probably it dates right back to the original Pike design of ~1904.

The Burroughs Pike Visible Model production starts as/when the Pike operation is moved from their orginal Orange, NJ factory to a new-built factory in Detroit. The stated plan at the time is to make 7000 machines a year in the new, expanded facilities. That would account for a quarter of Burroughs output for 1912. By volume, that is - by value it would be a lot less, the Pike was at the lower end of the Burroughs machines price-range.

The Burroughs Visible is included in the company naming system as their Class 3 machine and continues until it is superseded by the more modern and modular design of the Portable (Class 8 and 9 machines). Judging by the number of these 'Pike Visible' machines still turning up today on classifieds and auction sites, it really did sell in large numbers. 

The Portable of 1925 sold in even larger numbers over ~40 years. It kept the Pike's spool and ribbon; keeping the 7/16" ribbon with the keyhole spools in production for more than half a century!

When Burroughs introduces a typewriter for office work in the '30s, they however conform to the 'industry expectations' and use a regular half-inch ribbon. The original Class 1 and 2 machines used a very wide ribbon, so for a time there were (at least) three different sizes of ribbons sold by Burroughs for their machines.

In the 1950s, the Pike spools are used in the Rooy portable typewriter. An astonishingly thin 'ultraportable' typewriter; a design where 1/16th of an inch saving would be relevant. The smaller diameter of the spool would help as well. 

(Above image shows keyhole spool on M. Schrad's Rooy on The Typewriterdatabase.)

Using the Burroughs adding machine ribbon and spool design meant that availability was not an issue; the Burroughs Portable was in production until the 1960s (as P-Series machines) and the enormous installed base of machines meant that replacement spools and ribbons were widely available. Rooy thus could get the benefit of a 'custom' smaller size part without having to support an own proprietary format.

(Above on the site of Ribbons Unlimited)

And even today these keyhole spools with narrow ribbon are still available! Not just the narrow ribbon, but even complete with appropriate spools. Stocks won't last, but there may still be a lot of these floating around. As a business-only item not very visible to the general public, but the keyhole spool will have been fairly common. 

A succesful design, like the Portable itself :)

Friday, February 6, 2026

Marchant Pony transfer levers - adjusting

The Marchant Pony calculator did basically work after re-assembly, but not very well. It was noisy and 'rough' to operate, although it is hard to tell what these machines would've been like when new. Setting numbers was fine, but adding to the result-register required quite some force and especially the carries would sometimes block the machine. I.e. small calculations worked, but anything with several carries or larger numbers blocked - that for sure is not what it would've been when new.

Adjusting the drum position relative to the carriage already helped a lot with the required force - there are no dowel-pins on this machine to lock the side-brackets, so these can be adjusted a mm or so. Distance adjusted to create the smallest pressure-angle of pinwheel to the intermediate gears, whilst still no parts clashing that shouldn't.

The carries were likely blocked by the transfer levers requiring too high a force to push out. Feeling by hand, some were very hard to move.

These levers are held with a spring-loaded pin against a rod through their slot, toggled between out- and in-position. An extra tooth on a numeral wheel pushes it out, a cam on the drum pushes it back in. In the transfer-lever's out position, it causes an extra count on the next-up numeral wheel by the drum.

Taking the carriage off the machine, the force needed to push out and back in every transfer lever was measured. This confirmed that these forces were indeed very high and also varied a lot per position!

Pushing over 900 gram-force via that tooth by a single pin of the pinwheel is of itself worrying - risk of damage to that single pin. The variation in forces is likely caused by the springs and pins of a position being too stiff and/or rough.

The hole for the spring-loaded pin is (well..., should be) on the centre-line of the lever and centred in the slot, as per drawing. Differences between in- and out-forces then from an irregularly shaped pin, or maybe small deviations of a part. This calculator had very few of the original pins (or springs) left; most are 'crafted' replacements made when it was completely rebuilt sometime in the past. Whatever the reasons; the forces were too high.

With the force-meter at hand to test a position, all transfer-levers were re-assembled one-by-one. I.e. for every position the spring and also the little beveled pin trimmed to bring the forces somewhere between 200 and 400 gram-force. Lower forces to push out would be even nicer, but it became more difficult to make the levers 'snap' to their end-positions when pushed over the centre of their toggle.

After the re-fixing of the side-walls with improved drum-distance and tuning of the transfer-levers the calculator is noticeably lighter to operate. As bonus it's a bit less noisy too. The machine is now capable of doing zero minus one with a ripple-carry over 13 positions - still a challenge, but it can be done. Carries no longer block the machine! All that having been said; it is not as smooth and light-running as e.g. a 1930s Odhner or Thales. This of course may simply be wear of this particular specimen and not its design.

During some more testing, one position started to fail doing a carry. This was caused by the lever not 'flipping' fully to the out position. By pushing in a rod from the right, some 'minimally invasive surgery' was possible on this single position. The offending lever was rotated off the rod to get at the spring and pin. Then re-assembled with a stronger bevel filed to the pin of position 10 - the bevel helps it 'flip' to the end-positions when toggled.

The Marchant Pony B Special calculator; now with adjusted carriage slightly less noisy and capable of 13 carries in a row :-)

Sunday, February 1, 2026

Sighting of an old Adler on a shelf

During a trip last week, did a stop-off at a local thrift shop. On a shelf were a well-used Hermes standard and an old Adler. That Adler was surprising; pre-war machines rarely show up in thrifts stores anymore.


The decal on the cover was in great condition with cover-nuts present as well as original spools.

 
This may actually be a pre-pre-war machine; the serial number was I think 4-digits and that'd make it a pre-1914 specimen. (Serial number 6639 ? -should've taken a better picture.)


The drawband was disconnected (still present) and one keylever had been mistreated (bent?), but overall the machine looked complete and rustfree. The nickel should polish up fine, and the wide ribbon looked usable too.

Overall a decent machine with lots of potential to be a very fine ancient typewriter; at 45 Euro an entirely reasonable asking price too. (Left on their shelf :)

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Marchant Pony B calculator coming together

Now that the main functional blocks of the calculator, i.e. the carriage, the setting-drum and the carriage-shifting are all re-built, the whole machine was put together again. A 'test fitting' , with all the covers on too.


The carriage cover had the 18th position blocked off, an old 'fix-up' of a severely damaged machine:


This blocking-off had been very neatly done with a soldered-on bit of brass. Now de-soldered and the hole cleaned-up:


The covers of Marchant machine 70049 are all stamped with '49', i.e. the last two digits of the serial number. For now, only the carriage back-cover was swapped-out with the part from the donor-machine (serial number unknown). The original of machine '49 was really very mangled - oddly so.


Several bits were also tackled or transplanted - the decimal-pointers and bars were taken from the donor-machine -and of course the wooden baseplate.

When putting the cover on the carriage, the counter register did not align properly with the openings - the left digits drop below the viewing holes.


Some checking found that this was not due to a wrong assembly or the carriage itself being bent, but simply because the holes in the cover are misaligned! The cover part is manufactured over many separate stamping steps, so there is a risk of the plate not being fully seated against the alignment pegs on one of these steps. A small misalignment in the tool this time (i.e. back in 1920) resulted in a slight misalignment in the counter-holes. Not major, but still unexpected that this got past final-inspection - these were very expensive machines! A Pony B Special sold new for well over 300 dollar in 1920.


For the whole 'typical look' of the Marchant, a quick-fix reproduction nameplate was mounted on the top-cover and a bit of felt was cut to size to put between baseboard and machine. The long-lost factory original felt probably was black or dark purple/blue, but green is nice too.


To try make the calculator work smoother and as a test, the right sidewall here swapped out with the donor-machine's sidewall (that does not have the brass weld repair) - it really is a luxury to have so many spare parts to choose from! :-)


There still remain many small items to be worked out, but this Marchant Pony B Special calculator basically works again. It does not work very well yet, but it's a start :)

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Agelist for Underwood frame numbers (left-foot numbers re-visited)

Spurred on by extra datapoints of Underwood typewriters left-foot numbers on The Database (Thank you James!), and now looking only at the Underwood 5 samples, there are enough points to reasonably map a relation.  [Updated graph; showing 24 Underwood 5 numbers.] 

It is not quite a linear fit (the portfolio mix of Underwood was evolving), but a polynomial fit gives a pretty good correlation. Using that fitted relation and the serial numbers from the agelist, then an 'auxiliary' agelist based on frame numbers can be created:

year frame number
1905    75,000
1906   115,000
1907    154,000
1908   206,000
1909   260,000
1910   329,000
1911      410,000
1912   515,000
1913   639,000
1914   769,000
1915   883,000
1916   998,000
1917 1,141,000
1918 1,287,000
1919 1,422,000
1920 1,601,000
1921 1,812,000
1922 1,948,000
1923 2,130,000
1924 2,323,000
1925 2,520,000
1926 2,768,000
1927 3,005,000
1928 3,214,000
1929 3,386,000

This agelist from frame numbers (a.k.a. the front-left foot numbers) probably has a margin of about a quarter-year either way. Note that after 1926 the first digit of the frame number can be missing, but the full number likely still stamped on the carriage side.

This 'auxiliary' agelist very likely can also give a year-estimate for Underwood typewriters that fall in other serial number ranges than the 5, but were built from the same frame-casting and assembly line.

There's more information still to be had from more data - e.g. there are hints that 1916 saw a significant, sudden shift in the Underwood portfolio -or factory set-up. Also there are hints on batch-sizes, and production buffering was not completely first-in first-out either.

I.e. as more frame-numbers become known, the data will improve and more information can be extracted. 

But already possible is a rough "front-left foot agelist"  :-)

[Update: volume estimates.]

After 1929 the data becomes hazy; maybe because of portfolio shifts or because of the market upheaval from the October stock market crash. After October the sales of expensive business equipment such as typewriters (or Elliot Fisher bookkeeping machines!) probably collapsed.

Nevertheless, between about 1905 and 1929 there seems a robust set of numbers; both for Underwood 5 serials and for all Underwood frames (on that typewriter-frame line, at least). This means an estimate can be made of the volumes and volume-share of the ubiquitous Underwood 5 for the company:

This shows the fluctuations of the overall sales, and also that the share of Underwood 5 (and 4) machines is more than 90% of machines in 1905, but by the end of the 1920s has dropped to about 60% of sales. It has become a less dominant product for the company - typewriter sales have become more diversified; the business market perhaps becoming more receptive to special features such as wider (and more costly) carriages.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Marchant carriage shifting mechanism repair

The carriage shifting mechanism of the early Marchant calculators is very recognisable, it gives these machines a distinct profile. This mechanism is subject of a 1916 Marchant patent and is quite exposed on the front of the machine - putting it at increased risk of damage.

One of the levers was indeed broken on the target machine, the broken-off piece fortunately still held inside the mechanism.

To try fixing this, the lever was taken out. Fortunately the rod that holds it all in place was freely movable, so slid over to the left and the parts taken out (hold the spring as you slide the rod, to prevent it shooting off into the distance).

The right shifting lever was indeed broken, and actually had an old repair that had failed!

The original steel lever arm (rocker arm) had originally broken where it's weakened by the hole for the connecting rod.

To repair it, some time long ago a brass plate had been soldered to the side and two drilled/pins were added. The solder connection of the brass to the rocker arm had however failed and the part again broke.

After very thorough cleaning of the part, the old repair was re-soldered. The pins could now also be embedded in solder and extra care was taken (flux, much flux) that the solder reached the entire contacting surface of the brass plate with the lever. Hopefully the solder will hold, to be able to keep the original levers on this machine; they are stamped with the last digits of the serial number - parts of machine 70049.

The whole carriage shifter design seems a bit 'out of character' with the rest of the calculator. Even though it works well and is easy to use, it looks (overly?) complicated in its parts design. Even the lever is assembled from three separate parts; three stampings (needing multiple tools!) and a turned rod. Below shown as loose parts; the two different (!) rocker arms and the keypad - these need assembling and 'riveting' together.

That's not even mentioning the complex locking-pin, the swaying gear assembly and complicated casting details of the base. Quite a few parts to be assembled, with a few very tricky springs to insert as well. Here in in the factory; assembly of the full-size Marchant A, not the Pony:

It does however work very well, is surprisingly easy to use and is an (the) original Marchant-specific part of the calculator.

Comparing to the donor-machine, there are again multiple small differences also in this mechanism. These machines are probably very close together in time; the donor machine (shown on right) will date to late 1919 (November?) and the target machine (shown on left) probably is an early 1920 machine.


The levers are different; an extra spring-hook and a changed order of plating the part. Different torsion springs, even the base-casting is different!


Also the locking spring-plate of 1919 (left) is entirely different from the 1920 item (right). The pin from the donor machine was filed to fit the target machine; to replace the pin with the broken-off carriage-release tab.

All put together on the target machine and the carriage shifts again as it should! :)

Monday, January 12, 2026

Pinwheel drum of a Marchant Pony B - cleaning and its manufacturing

The pinwheel drum of the donor-machine was blocked - that is, no column would operate all pin-positions, pins were rusted solid in retracted position. Part as a rehearsal for overhauling the drum of the target-machine, partially to see if this drum could be better and partially just out of curiosity; taken apart for a cleaning and overhaul.

To take the drum out of a pinwheel calculator, one of the sidewalls has to be removed (i.e. a 'bracket', in Marchant-parlance). Then the drum itself can be taken out and apart. First step for that is to remove the pinned gear at the counter-side (the left in image below). Second is to remove the holding nut (red arrow).

The biggest challenge in cleaning this drum was the loosening of the holding-nut. This needed heat (soldering iron) and even some carefully-aimed hammerblows to start moving. (Clamp shaft in vise with protection, eg copper, don't apply any force to the disks!) The taper-pin of the counter-gear on the other hand came out easily. With the counter-gear and holding nut removed, all the sections of the drum simply slide off. Then a collection of 9 pinwheel disks, 3 carry-segments, clearing-arm, clreaing-arm-ring, a collar, one holding-nut, counter-gear, locking-comb, comb-pushpin, comb-spring and of course the main shaft:


The pinwheel disks are held together by two screws and a cover-plate. The carry-pins in disks 2 to 9 are peened in-place and cannot be removed. A brass disk, operating-ring, detent_spring, 9 pins, 2 screws and a retaining plate:


All disks (or dials) are different, specific to the angles of the specific dial digit-position. The timing of the pins and especially the tens-carry is staggered over the drum. The dimensions of the parts for every dial are thus different. Angles are given in the setting of the dividing-table of the slot milling machine.


The diameter of the drum is divided in 37 positions. Central 9 positions are needed for the setting pins, slightly staggered from disk-to-disk -to spread the load of turning the numeral wheels over the turn of the crank. Outside of this centre setting-pin 'field', there are the 10-carry pins spiraling out from dial 1. These carry-pins need one position offset from disk-to-disk to allow a wheel to do a full carry before the next engages.

The steel cams that reset the ten-carry levers are most clearly different; shown in this below drawing - these cams are all stamped with their position number.


The position-specific parts of a dial are all marked with their position number (an obvious and very useful thing to have in manufacturing) - below for example dial number 7:


Dial parts were cleaned individually: steelwool to de-rust the plate and metal-polish for the pins and ring. A very small amount of light, clean mineral oil (sewing machine oil) in assembly and some vaseline rubbed on the retaining plate against rust. When put together again, all pins move - although perhaps not quite as smoothly yet as they would have when new. 


Taking apart the drum also revealed markings from the manufacturing process.


The drum of the donor-machine is marked at the outside of dial 1 with a date and initials. This suggests that employee RA assembled this drum on October 15, 1919 (a Wednesday). 


Several -not all- of the pinwheels (or dials) are marked with initials TH scratched on the retaining plate. Individual disks were assembled separately, with employee TH scratching their initials into every disk they made on the obvious surface to do so. 

Dials were first assembled and stacked per dial-number onto a stake on a wooden plate. There are even photographs of this in the Marchant factory around that time. A store of assembled dials in a 'vault' cabinet from a 1918 article and stacks on a workbench in a cropped detail of a 1920 photo captioned "service department" (?):


Another thing found out when comparing the two drums (and trying to exchange) was that the large driving-gear is not in a pre-determined position to the drum. That was surprising. It is a press-fit onto the drum-shaft that has the keyway to orient all the dials and parts. The gear teeth position appears to have been random, but at a first assembly of a machine the crank-handle shaft would be drilled for the handle. Thus the two shafts are matched in the angle of gears, they work on that specific combination. This was concluded from the gears on the drums of the donor and target machine not being at the same tooth-position. 

The small angular-offset if mixing parts between machines is probably not too noticeable for a regular Pony, but for a Special with the check-dials it means that the check-dial gears won't mesh perfectly centred with the gear on ste setting-dials:


Effect of all this is that replacing a crank-shaft may mean also needing to exchange the drum-shaft. They are matched sets.

Anyhow, continuing the drum re-assembly in 2026. All the clean parts laid out and slid onto the shaft:


And put together again.


And then mounted into the target-machine - both drum and crankshaft from the donor-machine.


The target-machine original drum actually worked relatively fine after a little oil and a work-out. This donor-drum may in the end not be kept in the machine, it does however enable using the straight crankshaft. A restoration choice to be made later; straight shaft, but not the original for machine 70049 - an authenticity question...

The set of drum and shaft from 70049 now out of the machine, to get the same deep-cleaning and rebuild - no scratched-in date, but a stamped A-number instead. Maybe there are some hidden markings on the internals yet to be found :)